




Ce JavaScript tutorial fournit de nombreuses solutions compl?tes d?taill?es ainsi que Des outils JavaScript, les applications en ligne sur le Web pour les d?veloppeurs web pour optimiser la vitesse , temps de chargement de codes JavaScript - l'un des facteurs pour obtenir un meilleur rendement pour nos sites Web
optimiseurs de site en ligne ? faire optimisations site mieux , plus efficace
Speed u200Bu200BUp de performances JavaScript avec SharePoint Minifier
? 20+ Helpful Web Tools for Better Code Development
? Writing JavaScript Code Efficiently
? Organizing your JavaScript code Better
Here are some tips on high perfomance Javascript I have picked up. Most
of it comes from the books High Performance Javascript
by Nicholas C. Zakas and High Performance Web Sites
by Steve Souders.
Load the Javascript files right before the body, this will allow the
page to render without having to wait for all the Javascript files.
With normal loading, the files are loaded sequentially. Each file will
be loaded and parsed before the next file starts to load. Merge them
together into one large file. While you are at it, you should also
minimize it. Tools to help you with this are:
If normal loading with grouped files is not good enough, it is also
possible to load the files asynchronously. This will also allow you to
load files on demand. Tools for this are:
Literal values and local variables can be accessed very quickly. Array
access and member access take longer. If the prototype chain or scope
chain needs to be traversed, it will take longer the further up the chain
the access is. Global variables are always the slowest to access because
they are always last in the scope chain.
You can improve the performance of JavaScript code by storing frequently
used, object members, array items, and out-of-scope variables, in local
variables.
All DOM manipulation is slow.
The browser contains two trees, the DOM tree and a render tree.
Whenever the DOM layout or geometry is changed the view will have to be
re-rendered. This is known as reflow.
Reflow happens when:
Combine multiple DOM and style changes into a batch and apply them once.
This can be done with documentFragments or by cloning the node.
// Create a document fragment var fragment = document.createDocumentFragment(); // Do something with framgment // Append the fragments children to the DOM document.getElementById('mylist').appendChild(fragment);
// Clone Node var old = document.getElementById('mylist'); var clone = old.cloneNode(true); // Do something with clone // Replace node with clone old.parentNode.replaceChild(clone, old);
Use algortithms with better complexity performance for large collections.
Strings concatenation is quite fast in most browsers. In IE, you may
need to use Array.join.
Regular expression can be improved by:
The total amount of time that a single JavaScript operation should take
is 100. If it takes longer it needs to be split up, this can be done
using timers.
Two determining factors for whether a loop can be done asynchronously
using timers:
// Function for processing an array in parallel function processArray(items, process, callback) { var minTimeToStart = 25; var copyOfItems = items.concat(); setTimeout(function() { process(copyOfItems.shift()); if (copyOfItems.length > 0) setTimeout(arguments.callee, minTimeToStart); else callback(items); }, minTimeToStart); } // Function for processing multiple tasks in parallel function processTasks(tasks, args, callback) { var minTimeToStart = 25; var copyOfTasks = steps.concat(); setTimeout(function() { var task = copyOfTasks.shift(); task.apply(null, args || []); if (copyOfTasks.length > 0) setTimeout(arguments.callee, minTimeToStart); else callback(); }, minTimeToStart); }
You should limit the number of high-frequency repeating timers in your
web application. It is better to create a single repeating timer that
performs multiple operations with each execution.
It is not recommended to have minTimeToStart less than 25
milliseconds, because there is a risk that the timers will fill up the
queue.
// Timed version of process array, where each version is able to // process items from the array for up to 50 milliseconds. function timedProcessArray(items, process, callback) { var minTimeToStart = 25; var copyOfItems = items.concat(); setTimeout(function() { // (+) converts the Date object into a numeric representation var start = +new Date(); do { process(copyOfItems.shift()); } while (copyOfItems.length > 0 && (+new Date() - start < 50)); if (copyOfItems.length > 0) setTimeout(arguments.callee, minTimeToStart); else callback(items) }, minTimeToStart); }
Newer browsers support web workers. Web workers does not run in the
UI-thread and does not affect responsiveness at all. Their environment
is limited to allow this to work. It is limited to:
It is not possible to create a WebWorker from code. It needs to be
started with its own javascript file. You can however communicate with
it through events.
// Application code var worker = new Worker("code.js"); worker.onmessage = function(event) { alert(event.data); }; worker.postMessage("Tapir"); // Worker code (code.js) //inside code.js importScripts("file1.js", "file2.js"); // importing some files self.onmessage = function(event) { self.postMessage("Hello, " + event.data + "!"); };
Any code that takes longer than 100 milliseconds to run should be
refactored to use webworkers to decrease the load on the UI-thread.